Newsflash

Attention IE Users

Read more...
J.Y. Interpretation 652 Print
Written by Administrator   
Tuesday, 09 December 2008

J.Y. Interpretation 652



On December 5, 2008 the Justices of the Constitutional Court issued Interpretation 652


釋字第516號解釋「相當之期限」有無上限?

憲法第十五條規定,人民之財產權應予保障,故國家因公用或其他公益目的之必要,雖得依法徵收人民之財產,但應給予合理之補償,且應儘速發給。倘原補償處分已因法定救濟期間經過而確定,且補償費業經依法發給完竣,嗣後直轄市或縣(市)政府始發現其據以作成原補償處分之地價標準認定錯誤,原發給之補償費短少,致原補償處分違法者,自應於相當期限內依職權撤銷該已確定之補償處分,另為適法之補償處分,並通知需用土地人繳交補償費差額轉發原土地所有權人。逾期未發給補償費差額者,原徵收土地核准案即應失其效力,本院釋字第五一六號解釋應予補充。


Translation coming soon.
Last Updated ( Saturday, 20 December 2008 )
< Prev   Next >
Copyright 2008-2013 taiwanlawresources.com. All rights reserved. Disclaimer
Mambo is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.